Why Traditional Financial Planning Excluded Millions
Joshi argues that the traditional financial-planning model was expensive, asset-gated, conflicted, and too narrowly focused on retirement accumulation. She contrasts that with subscription pricing, separation between sales and planning, and advice that can favor paying debt over investing.
- Traditional access often required more than one million dollars in assets.
- Asset-based and commission models can distort recommendations.
- A retirement-and-investment focus misses many financial-life questions.
- Subscription pricing allows advice without requiring investable assets.
- Separating sales from planners reduces product-selling incentives.
“it's financial planning has really been something that's quite expensive and it's quite it's quite exclusive”
“our cfps don't make commissions on selling products”