Why Aliche Rejects Whole Life Insurance for the Average Person
Aliche argues that life insurance should protect dependants and cover debt during money-making years, not masquerade as an ordinary wealth-building product. She says term coverage is dramatically cheaper and that whole life generally makes sense only after an extremely wealthy person has exhausted other wealth-building options.
- Insurance exists primarily to protect against loss
- Whole life cash value may produce weak returns
- Large premium differences can make whole life hard to sustain
- Term length should match debt, dependant, and earning-year exposure
- A fee-only CFP avoids product-sales incentives
“the average person unless you're like Beyonce or or or Oprah or whatever doesn't need whole life insurance”
“the real benefit to whole life is to the person that sold it to you”